| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
dark heartt
I Own Four Sheep
Nyratic
269
   |
Posted - 2013.05.17 04:25:00 -
[1] - Quote
Ellen Thrace wrote:
IsBoxer allows automation, which is in fact a violation of the EULA,
an automation that facilitates actions that lead to the acquisition at accelerated rate.
You know, I've been watching this thread for a little while now and you always come back to this "ISBoxer allows automation" argument, without any proof to show that it does in fact allow for automation. The program itself allows inputs that the player makes, to be duplicated into another client. The player is still making all inputs, all the program does is duplicate them.
The automation referred to in the EULA has always been about people being able to leave their keyboard and the game (or more to the point the bot) continues to perform actions. Now if you can show that the program automates this process to allow them to leave their keyboard and still perform actions, then do it. If not then your argument is based purely on your dislike for the software, not on any sort of fact.
Bienator II:
"You can identify eve players by looking at their cars. Since they don't drive what they can't afford to lose."
I play in highsec. |
dark heartt
I Own Four Sheep
Nyratic
274
|
Posted - 2013.05.17 10:56:00 -
[2] - Quote
dark heartt wrote: Now if you can show that the program automates this process to allow them to leave their keyboard and still perform actions, then do it. If not then your argument is based purely on your dislike for the software, not on any sort of fact.
Still haven't answered my question.
Bienator II:
"You can identify eve players by looking at their cars. Since they don't drive what they can't afford to lose."
I play in highsec. |
dark heartt
I Own Four Sheep
Nyratic
287
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 14:29:00 -
[3] - Quote
Askulf Joringer wrote:+1 Is boxer is utter bull ****.
It's a 3rd party program that grats a rather significant advantage compared to players who do not utilize it. If that's not against the eula, then I don't know what is.
Have you used it? If not then you don't know what advantages or disadvantages it provides beyond your bias. And also, if you read the thread you will see a post from a senior GM that clearly states it's not against the EULA.
Bienator II:
"You can identify eve players by looking at their cars. Since they don't drive what they can't afford to lose."
I play in highsec. |
dark heartt
I Own Four Sheep
Nyratic
297
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 00:45:00 -
[4] - Quote
Ellen Thrace wrote:Hexor V wrote:
- You don't understand what Multi-boxing is
- You don't understand what botting is
- You don't understand that there is a difference between them
- You don't understand what RMT is
- You don't understand what PLEX are nor the importance of them in EvE's economy
I understand them very well. But you don't, obviously. Stop saying what you think others think and just give your opinion on the matter. And stop trolling everybody.
It's pretty clear you don't understand any of those things. Perhaps you should actually do some research, with an unbiased mindset, on those things. Once you know what you are talking about, then you can come back and tell us how bad ISBoxer is. Until then, you are still refusing to look outside your bias.
Ellen Thrace wrote:
But what I find being more insidious is the fact that it is against the spirit of Group Play. Online games should be about human interaction, that's what the Internet does. Or do you want to go back to Single Player games on your computer isolated from the rest of the world ?
If you take a moment to look at my post history, you will see that I push for group play where ever possible. I always have and always will. However I can understand why someone might just want to mine for a bit to make some isk, and if they want to use a program that is allowed by the EULA to maximise their ISK intake, they are totally fine to do so in my book. Sure they are the ones losing out as we all know that playing with other people is more fun than playing by yourself, but if they choose to do so, they are welcome to do so.
Bienator II:
"You can identify eve players by looking at their cars. Since they don't drive what they can't afford to lose."
I play in highsec. |
dark heartt
I Own Four Sheep
Nyratic
353
|
Posted - 2013.06.10 03:40:00 -
[5] - Quote
Ellen Thrace wrote:Look who's mad.
BTW personal attacks are not allowed.
I just reply to clarify some things here:
Many of the things on your post have been discussed before on this thread, you are just repeating and twisting.
You changed the words "automation" to "assisted AFKing" and "multiboxing" and quoted my post about automation, how about that for dishonest.
Now, Im sure you are an intelligent person and can understand the difference between:
MULTICLIENT, MULTIBOX Software and "translate/repeat keyboard/mouse commands to multiple clients".
So, to clarify my point of view:
MULTICLIENT - its allowed by CCP and its fine by me.
MULTIBOX Software - I dont like it but its allowed by CCP.
"translate/repeat keyboard/mouse commands to multiple clients" - this is absolutely shameful !
I dont care what other games or CCP think about it,
I WILL NEVER EMBRACE IT ! ! !
That's fine, so now stop thinking about it, and just move along. Surely it's not that big of a deal that you need to post with capslock and so much simmering rage...
Bienator II:
"You can identify eve players by looking at their cars. Since they don't drive what they can't afford to lose."
I play in highsec. |
| |
|